THREE interviews with the "man who never gives interviews."

XFrom "The Comic Fan" #2, 1965 (Cover on right.)
Conducted by Gary Martin

Gary: Do you prefer inking to penciling?

Steve Ditko: Like both, each has its own fascinating problems.

Gary: Do all Marvel artists work twice-up?
Steve: I think so.

Gary: Do you use blue pencil for rough sketches?
Steve: No!

Gary: Would you prefer to draw and ink or do you prefer other people to ink your pencils?
Steve: Rather do it all myself.

Gary: What type of pen do you prefer? Do you prefer pen to a brush?
Steve: I change off from one to the other. I use different ones, depending on how I feel. I like a Hunt 102.

Gary: Does Marvel allow their artists anything in the way of supplies?
Steve: Nothing supplied.

Gary: Do you uses some type of opaque color to erase mistakes?
Steve: Sometimes. I also use razor blade or ink eraser.

Gary: Have you ever considered syndicating a strip?
Steve: Yes, but not seriously.

Gary: Do you have any personal dislikes in comics?
Steve: I have them about everything.

Gary: What is your favorite TV show?

Steve: Don’t watch TV.

Gary: How long does it take to complete a page of art?
Steve: It depends on how I feel and interest in the story and deadline.

XGary: Who originated Capt. Atom?
Steve: Someone at Charlton Press. Don’t know exactly who as I just worked out costume, etc.

Gary: Why was he discontinued?
Steve: I don’t know.

Gary: Who originated Spider-man?
Steve: Stan Lee thought the name up. I did costume, web gimmick on wrist, & spider signal.

Gary: Would you enjoy continuing on him?
Steve: If nothing better comes along.

Gary: About your art, have you ever attempted painting or any other field of art?
Steve: No.

Gary: Is there a chance of a revival of Captain Atom?
Steve: Only Charlton Press can answer that.

Gary: Do you/did you ever draw from models?
Steve: Once, when studying.

Gary: Do you stick to your assigned script or do you sometimes drift?
Steve: I am allowed to drift.

Gary: Other than practice, practice, and practice,
what other advice to ‘budding’ young artists do you offer?
Steve: Learn what is right & wrong about drawing or art. Practicing bad drawing habits is an awful waste. Study anatomy -- you should know what is under the skin and how it moves. Study people – to see how the muscles and bones cause the various shadows, bumps and shapes – their Xgestures, emotions, habits -- everything about them. Study other artists -– to see how they interpret anatomy, people, etc. Everything today, whether it’s a light bulb or the English language -– or a car, is the result of people building on the knowledge before us. Everyone adding something of their own. That is why you must study:
1. The basic anatomy, composition drapery, and even story telling.
2. Then seeing how this basic anatomy, or basic drapery looks on human beings in various poses, lighting or conditions, wet clothing is different than dry.
3. And studying other artists to see how they interpret the basic anatomy composition, drapery, etc. This does not mean you can copy what they do -– but help you understand how it is done, and why.

To show a man laughing – means definite muscles must move, yet ten different artists can draw ten different pictures and all be right and not two drawings alike. Basically, yes – they’re all the same – since smiling action must conform to anatomy, but the artist’s individual approach to how to show it sets him apart.
1. Study the basics
2. She how it appears in life
3. How others interpret it
4. And from it all do it in a way that you personally feel is right or good.

BELOW: A page from THE MEGALOMANICIAL SPIDER-MAN by Peter Bagge showing an older "Peter Parker" (standing in for Steve Ditko) being interviewed in his office.

From "Marvel Main" #4, October 1968
Conducted by Mike, Mark and Rich

"An Interview with The Man of Mystery"

MIKE: Your last two or three strips (Question, Mr. A, Creeper) have all dealt with reporters and mobster-type crime. Is this a personal crusade of yours?
Steve Ditko: Reporters have an easier, more natural way of getting involved with all types of crime. They are not restricted with set routines or limited in their scope of activities. I prefer conflicts that are based on reality, rather than based on fantasy. When you get wound up with super villains, super fantastic gadgets and super incredible action, everything has to be made so deliberately that it all becomes senseless. It boils down to what you want a story to stand for.

MIKE: During your years at Marvel, you were only depicted once and that time by your own hand (Spider Man Special #1) whereas you were left out of the Bullpen photos (Marvel Tales #1, pictured right) and the record (MMMS Kit #l). Was this by your own choice?
SD: Yes.

Click below to hear the MMMS record Ditko was "left out of." Stan Lee is speaking on the phone with Sol Brodsky, Marvel production manager, and suddenly...

MIKE: In the 1967 Comics Awards Poll conducted by noted fans Mike Robertson and Ted Silly, you usurped such greats as Kirby, Wood, Frazetta and Williamson by a substantial margin. How do you feel about this and how do you think it happened?

SD: This is the first time I’ve heard of the poll, but I don’t feel anything in particular because it doesn’t affect me in any way. A poll only means that X number of people prefer one to another. It doesn’t make one a better artist. Good art or anything cannot be decided by a poll, popularity or likes and dislikes. A preference is not a standard for what is good or right. Everything has to be measured with a clearly defined, appropriate standard. People’s likes or dislikes or preferences may change but it can’t affect a proper standard that remains unaltered. I don’t know why each person voted the way he did.

MIKE: Did anyone or anything particularly influence your style?

SD: The biggest thing influencing my style would be that I see things in a certain way and that means handling everything so that personal point of view comes across.

MIKE: When did you break into comics and who did you first work for?

SD: In 1953. A very small publishing company. I don’t even remember the company’s name.

MIKE: Out of all the characters that you have created, which is the best extension of your thoughts and beliefs? Why?

SD: The Question (and Mr. A, I can’t seem to separate the two). Why? They are positive characters, not negative. They stand for something.They know what they stand for and why they must make that stand. They are not just against something. Every criminal in the world is Xopposed to himself being robbed or murdered, but do these criminals stand for justice. Being against something isn’t enough.

Every person, whether he wants to be or not, is in a continous struggle. It’s not a physical life or death struggle yet it’s a threat to every man’s survival. No man has to battle or fear the supernatural. It doesn’t exist. No man has to fight or fear creatures from outer space. No man has to battle foreign armies. The country’s armed forces are prepared for that possibility. A man’s battle isn’t against foreign conspiracies, the FBI and CIA are set up and equipped to deal with that threat.

The police are equipped to deal with crime. Health problems are battled by the medical profession. Against any of the above dangers, no man has to face them alone. But in that one continuous struggle, man has to constantly face the danger alone. No one can face it or fight it for him. It is the struggle for his mind! It is the struggle against everyone he comes in contact with. It is a struggle to keep his mind from being corrupted and being ruled by irrational premises. A man is what he stands for. Why is it right to stand for it and to protect and defend for all the time? In the struggle, a man can lose only if he gives in, defeated by self destruction, by accepting the wrong as right to act against himself.

Honest men, like dishonest men, are made. The honest refuse to accept wrong as right the dishonest refuse to accept right as right. Each deliberately makes a choice. This struggle is not openly recognized. Accepting lies, dishonesty, etc. or practicing evasions, etc., are not criminal acts. Nothing but a man’s own mind can protect him from accepting and practicing the irrational, and suffering from it’s corrupting effects, but a man has to choose to do it. This is the premise that the Question and Mr. A are based on. Evil is powerless.

A mind that refuses to accept or defend the truth, by that act, permits lies to exist, to give them respectability and influence, thereby undercutting and eventually destroying everything that is of real value. Destroyed, not by the power of evil, but by the good’s refusal to protect itself against an enemy that could Xexist only with good’s permission. A man’s refusal to understand the issue changes nothing.

If a man doesn’t know why a thing is right or wrong, he has no defenses. He’s vulnerable. He has no standard by which to measure, accept or reject any proposition. The Question and Mr. A are men who choose to know what is right and act accordingly at all times. Everyone should.

MIKE: Did any particular comic you’ve done cramp your style?

SD: Style is not what you do (type of story) but how you handle it (rendering). I could be cramped by the subject in doing, say, a World War II story, whereas in a science fiction tale, whatever I draw doesn’t have to look like anything that ever existed. The rendering (style) wouldn’t be affected, or more aspects will be emphasized, more or less light and shade, detail, etc.

MIKE: You’re referred to around fandom as Steve Ditko, man of mystery. Can you explain why there is a shroud of mystery surrounding yourself. Was this intentional, or did it just happen?

SD: It just happens because I’m a cartoonist in the comic book business not a performer or personality in show business. When I do a job, it’s not my personality that I’m offering the readers, but my art work. It’s not what I’m like that counts what I did and how well it was done. I produce a product, a comic art story. Steve Ditko is the brand name. I make no mystery of what I do, and where I can properly explain why I do what I do (like in this fanzine) I’ll do it. If a person knows the what and whys, he knows all about the “who” that is important to know.

MIKE: What strip do you enjoy doing the most?

SD: The Question and Mr. A.

MIKE: Most of us are well acquainted with your fantasy stories, which were exceptionally philosophical and created a lot of empathy with the characters. Did you write them yourself? Did you enjoy doing them?

SD: I wish you had listed some specific ones so that I’d know exactly what to comment on.

MIKE: What strip was the easiest you ever did? The hardest?

SD: No strip is easy for me to do, for I draw for a tough critic — me. I have to do what I think is right and that has to be done in a way that excites me so it’s hard to settle for something that would be easy to do. I believe in telling a picture story so that (1) The panels have to be clear. I have to show what’s going on. I want to know. (2) They have to be interesting. I don’t believe in boring myself while I draw. The hardest to draw were the Question and Mr. A because before I drew a line, I had to make them positive characters.

To know what they stood for, why it is right to make that stand. And to act the way they did, to have solid reasons so I could prove their position and actions if I was ever challenged. They had to be a man. A hero in the honest use of the word. Strength not because of “super” powers, but strength of acting on proper principles. Not a contrived strength of muscle, but a strength of Xright knowledge. No innocent people can suffer or be abused or penalized because of what the Question and Mr. A stand for.

I’m not a professional writer so it’s difficult to be properly objective about the writing, and to spot and correct mistakes. It’s easier to write or handle fantasy than to put forth a new stand that has to be clearly defined and constantly followed in everything that is said and done. It demands logical progression in thought and deed deliberately ignored in most comics stories.

Most of the art had to be deliberately underplayed. The panel scenes had to be interesting but not overly dramatic. The major conflict was a clash of right and wrong. The biggest threat and danger was not physical, but the destructive effects of spreading and unchallengingly accepting lies of minds run by irrationality, by choice or default. Over-dramatized art would’ve undercut conflict.

MIKE: Who, besides yourself, did in, your opinion, the best job of inking your pencils.

SD: I couldn’t say who without listing all the others and listing the why’s and why nots.

RICH: Why did you quit CREEPY and EERIE? Will you ever contribute again?

SD: I don’t know the full story of what went on at Warren, so I can’t comment on it. As for the future, I don’t know that either.

RICH: Art wise, do you prefer the regular comics or the Warren line, where you can do washes?

SD: I like them both. I even like to do stories in just pen and ink without color or wash. All stories are not suited for wash, but those that have the right element and mood are hard to beat in that medium.

RICH: Did you plot the stories you did for Warren?

SD: No, I worked from a script.

BELOW: "Room With A View," story by Archie Goodwin, art by Ditko. Instead of using grey tones, Ditko added detail by using extra rendering. Ditko called this style of drawing "tickling the board."


RICH: Besides yourself, who do you regard as the five best artists in comicdom?

SD: That question is too difficult to answer and be fair. You have to set up and give a standard on how you judge the artist and there are too many factors to be considered and they don’t fit every artist the same way. Artists fall into too many categories. Some are penciled; some are inkers; some do both. Some artists specialize in the type of story they do (romance, war, super heroes, etc.). Some types demand more or less imagination, or draftsmanship (war fantasy) and the artist has to be judged accordingly.

The artist has to be separated from the popularity of the strip, personality, etc. He can only be judged by his artwork and that has to be broken down into story telling, draftsmanship, composition, imagination, rendering, etc. Some artists are good in some phases, poor in others. You have to weigh the separate parts with the total effect, then try to separate the art (in black and white as the artist does it) from the effects or appeal of coloring (that the artist does not do and is not responsible for.)

So it’s much simpler for anyone to pick his own favorites, the ones that give him the most enjoyment, and let the serious art critics struggle with the burden of deciding who is the better artist.

RICH: What inspired the new Blue Beetle? Why do you think it didn’t sell?

SD: I was looking over the first Blue Beetle that Charlton press put out & it was terrible. I began thinking how it could have been handled. The ideas I had were good, so I marked them down, made sketches of the costume, gadgets, the bug, etc. I put them in an idea folder I have and forgot about it. A year or so later, when CP was again planning to do super-heroes, I told Dick Giordano about the BB idea I had. He was interested in trying it, so it came out of the idea file, and into the magazine. I think it would be more interesting and revealing to ask comic readers why they didn’t buy it.

RICH: Are there any plans to revive Blue Beetle and The Question, and will you do them?

SD: Only Charlton Press can answer that.

MARK: There is a strong similarity between The Question and Mr. A? Is this intentional? Why?

SD: I had been thinking about a type of character that would be different or that would be a step ahead of what was being done ever since the early Spider-Man days. The kind I decided on was the Mr. A type. When Blue Beetle got his own magazine, they needed a companion feature for it. I didn’t want to do Mr. A, because I didn’t think the Code would let me do the type of stories I wanted to do, so I worked up the Question, using the basic idea of a man who was motivated by basic black and white principles.

Where other “heroes” powers are based on some accidental super element, The Question and Mr. A’s “power” is deliberately knowing what is right and acting accordingly. But it is one of choice. Of choosing to know what is right and choosing to act on that knowledge in all his thoughts and actions with everyone he deals with. No conflict or contradiction in his behavior in either identity. He isn’t afraid to know or refuse to act on what is right no matter in what situation he finds himself. Where other heroes choose to be self-made neurotics, The Question and Mr. A choose to be psychologically and intellectually healthy. It’s a choice everyone has to make.

MARK: Would you give us some personal data? Age, marital status, children, etc.?

SD: It’s like you said… a man of mystery!

BELOW: Spidey and Doc Strange by Steve Ditko
From The New York Post, 2012, conducted by Reed Tucker

In 2012, Reed Tucker, a reporter from the New York Post dug up the address of Ditko's Manhattan studio, went there, and boldly knocked on the door. Ditko answered.

When The Post knocked on his door, Ditko — who turns out to be a owlish man with wisps of white hair and ink-stained hands, wearing large black glasses and an unbuttoned white shirt with a white tee beneath — pleasantly but firmly declines to answer any questions. Though he did say he reads The Post.

“I don’t have anything to say,” he says, standing in the doorway to his studio.

Rumors abound that he also lives there, but a source in the building says he might be living at a nearby hotel.

He forges ahead on black-and-white, self-published books with titles like The Avenging Mind.

“I do those because that’s all they’ll let me do,” he tells The Post, suggesting big publishers aren’t interested in his work anymore.

Tucker asked Ditko if he had been paid anything for the recent Spider-Man movies.

"No," the artist responded, "I haven't been involved with Spider-Man since the Sixties."